Slide 1
(Sociological versus common sense
explanations)
Today’s class outline
Sociological thinking
Examples & origins of common sense/naturalistic thinking
Private troubles/public issues
Slide 2
Sociology Alive (2nd edition)
Stephen Moore
Stanley Thornes Publishers Ltd
Sociology a new approach (3rd edition)
Haralambos, Smith, O’Gorman, Heald
Causeway Press
Slide 3
The study of human behaviour
is not unique to sociology
What makes sociology
distinctive is not what is studied
but how it is studied
Most of us will be familiar with
‘common sense’ answers to
social questions and may rely on a number of non-sociological ways of thinking
Slide 4
‘Common sense is not something rigid and stationary. It creates the folklore of the future…of popular knowledge in a given time and place.’ Antonio Gramsci
Or, as Gary Young (2008) puts it, ‘Common sense represents the received wisdom of years and the widespread opinion of the day. It may be rooted in fact, fiction, rumour or reality. On one level it doesn’t matter. So long as it is commonly held, then, in essence, common sense becomes a fact of life.’
Slide 5
Biological arguments
– gender
Psychological arguments
– suicide
Moralistic arguments
– poverty
Slide 6
These viewpoints derive from:
Individualistic assumptions
that don’t recognise the
importance of wider social
forces
Naturalistic assumptions
that don’t recognise that
behaviour is primarily
social (learned)
Slide 7
Origins of these ways of thinking
The essential points are:
One person’s ‘common sense’ is often another persons ‘nonsense’
That there is probably no such thing as ‘a’ human nature except in a very restricted sense that would not include most forms of what we would call behaviour
Slide 8