- possible water ice at poles
- radio waves reflected off ice
• 1998: Lunar Prospector
- also found evidence for ice
- crashed near pole in 1999
• Currently: Smart 1 Probe
- European satellite
- ion propulsion (several months!)
- will search for water at poles
Slide 14
• surface material: “regolith” –
pulverized by constant impacts
• ~2500 samples brought back
by astronauts; ~850 lbs total!!
• all rocks are IGNEOUS (i.e.,
from molten processes)
• totally dry rocks (no water)
• all rocks older than 3 Byr
Slide 15
•~ 3000 quakes/year
•much lower intensity
than Earth: 0.5-1.5 Richter
•indicate that Moon’s
interior is more rigid than
Earth’s (some ‘plasticity’)
Slide 16
• iron-rich core like Earth
• asthenosphere layer: somewhat pliable “plastic” layer
• solid layer just below surface – no plate tectonics
• smaller planet than Earth – less internal energy, less geological activity!
• moon probably had a weak magnetic field early in history
- core is now solid, so no current is generated
Slide 17
Color-coded images illustrate surface geography
Clementine data
• blue – lowland marias
• red - highlands
Galileo data – flyby in 1989
• blue – lowland marias
• red - highlands
Slide 18
Fission: originally part of Earth but torn free
Problem: would have fallen back or been flung into space, not into orbit.
Fails to explain why lunar chemistry differs from Earth's
Co-Creation: formed in its present orbit
can not explain why lunar chemistry differs from Earth's
Capture: formed as a separate planet but captured by Earth
Conditions for successful capture very stringent
Impact: formed from Mega-Impact of Mars-sized planet
Computer modeling suggests SS forms 100 or so small planets, then collide to make larger objects
can explain differences in chemistry:
impact occurred after chemical differentiation in Earth; therefore, not as much iron was part of the Moon
high temperatures during impact would have vaporized the volatile and water vapor in rocks
Currently favored model
Slide 19